I'm sorry but the graphics suck.

[:1]I have games from 10 years ago that have better graphics for the most part, physics no, fire effects probrably not but for characters and cutscenes yes. I mean with the stationary faces when talking, its just a little more than pathetic. Then there the 3rd person view and you cant even see the details of the character or the HR-V.



Now before anyone says graphics are a small part of a good game, these days they arent. With 30 inch screens and gpus like the 4870X2 being able to sustain sufficient frame rates on them I feel right in expecting modern day graphics from developers.



Also, the game would have improved miles if the camera was at least behind the shoulder rather than top down. WASD would also have improved combat drastically, as it is combat was very choppy and vague.|||Question.



Do I care? (Y/N)|||Legion Darrath|||@smith



The graphics don't suck, they are really good for a top/down-view game. How far have you played the game? And what did you see about how weapons and character -graphics automaticaly advance when you spend upgrade-parts to character stats and weapons? And i do not only mean if you install cybernetic-implants.|||Maledicus|||FieryBalrog|||I'm a mod? Erm.

How about no?



And I really don't care about the faces not moving in cutscenes or not being able to see my character while playing -_-



I blow aliens up, I am happy. Aliens blow *me* up and I'm not happy.|||smith|||Have you ever played "expendable"? It's about 10 years old and looks almost exactly the same as Space Siege. In fact, short of cybernetics, it's basically the same game.



However, I really don't care that they look the same (though it stays in the back of my mind the entire time).



P.S. I don't understand why people post just to say that they don't care. Don't they have something better to do? It's not exactly adding anything to the discussion.|||ghell|||Legion Darrath|||Neruz|||top down doesnt isnt the end all of excuses for poor graphics, I`m not asking for crysis level, or even HL2 graphics but I expect something better than a a few relatively low detailed unmoving pictures of characters` faces. The environment was also fairly pathetic, grey with a lot of exploisve barrels that are just randomly there, hell even Deus Ex had better graphics in a sense as long as you dont count the lighting and the glove fingersand several other trivial things|||rating a game for the graphics is like rating a porn movie for the story.|||The graphics aren't everything but could have been improved. They aren't terrible but, considering the very high expectations from a title with Chris Taylor's name on the box, they are decidedly "meh". The game is also quite short, which I assume is just leaving room for expansions or something and very linear. You can tell that this game was done in a relatively short space of time.



The part of the game I liked best was the choice you get near the end. |||edit - just spotted this was in Space Siege, not SupCom forum :)|||maybe you just got a sucky computer?|||Undefeatable